MS-DOS 7 was technically usable as a standalone version, but it lacked an installer, It would have made sense that some institutions were still depending on DOS back then when Microsoft decided to pull the plug for DOS. So why shouldn't a DOS 6.22/DOS 7 hybrid not have existed? Some WfW 3.11 versions in Germany also shipped with ISDN support and a FAX software (?). Like Windows 3.0 MME on CD, WfW 3.11 on CD, MS-DOS 6.2x on CD - with a bootable diskette. And pray that my post isn't being misunderstood by some crazy KI algorithm.īut on the other hand, there were weird, unofficial releases (OEM) at the time. I can only speculate about it at this point, of course. Maybe that's why there's some rumor about a secret version of DOS 6.x. It was being used in Europe, by Siemens and other industrial companies. Years before, there was an early multi-tasking DOS (MS-DOS 4, circa 1986) that wasn't officially being sold. It was being mentioned in magazines or books, I vaguely remember. I heard rumors about an enhanced DOS 6.x even back in the 90s. From Microsoft, only MS-DOS 7.1 and 8.0 supported FAT32 but they were treated as part of the Windows 9x kernel (unofficially, MS-DOS 7.x can be used like older standalone versions). Those rumors about these non-existent versions existed way before these chatbots. Was fooling around with the new Bing and asked it this question, but was there any real evidence? When I worked in the military, as soon as NT 3.51 was certified we started using that, MS-DOS 6.22 was only really used to prepare a disk or used on legacy training systems, nothing important, so I think it is an urban myth, but would be happy to be wrong.ĭid a search on this years ago, but never found anything concrete, what are the thoughts or proof from the wider community?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |